Writers: Don’t Lose Your Worth

There’s a move happening in the world of arts and entertainment, particularly in the realm of the book industry. 

I hear tell that the industry is in a state of emergency, and has been for years.  Apparently, people aren’t reading as much as they used to.  Ebook sales are climbing, but as digital books are usually cheaper to purchase than printed books, some publishers feel that books are not being sold for what they are truly worth.  Physical bookstores are struggling to stay in business while more readers are opting for the convenience and lower cost of ebooks.  Borders filed for bankruptcy; Barnes & Noble went up for sale.  Publishers are laying off employees and aren’t willing to take as many chances on new authors, making it more difficult for authors to get their work out there.  As a result, there’s an “indie revolution” happening, as independent authors who have been rejected by traditional publishers are taking it upon themselves to find other means of publication, like subsidy and self-publishing.

I’m an indie author myself, and I’ve picked up on the disgruntled and determined tone floating through my corner of the indie universe.  “Traditional publishers are the uppity enemy and we don’t need ’em!  We’re finding our own ways to get things done.”  Yet, in all of the buzz and words of doom circulating throughout the industry, there’s something valuable that is in danger of being lost, if publishers and authors are not careful.

You see, what bothers me the most is the notion that people aren’t “reading” anymore.  I believe that authors must take into account that while there may be increasing methods for people to acquire the information that they want and need, people are still going to go after the information, ultimately.  There was a time when no one had the option of listening to the radio, turning on the television, going to the movies, or browsing the Internet, as that kind of technology wasn’t around before books.  So, yes, someone today may choose the option of taking a few hours to watch a documentary instead of using those hours to read a book on the same subject, but the detail to be seen here is that the hunger for information is still there.  Humankind searches for knowledge; humankind searches for entertainment.  That’s what humans do.  But when humans turn on their televisions or click on their e-readers, what kind of content are they being provided with?

Of course publishers and booksellers must take a look at how they do business and the methods that they use as the tide in the industry changes, but they should pause to ask themselves, “Wait, what are we really looking to produce?”  They have to think about their consumers, as the people who are buying books don’t mean to merely buy them.  They mean to read them.  If publishers get into the habit of putting out loads of flashy or fad-driven but poor quality product, with the meager intent of making quick sales, then their plans will backfire.  It’s not that people no longer desire to read, but they do desire literature that is, in fact, worth reading.  Though it may sometimes take a while for consumers to catch on, they eventually realize when they are being presented with product that wasn’t thoughtfully produced, and they will consequently stop buying so much of it.

Now, I am not against fads.  We are human beings, and every so often, we need something fresh, catchy, and exciting to spark our interest.  Keeping up with fads is enjoyable, but when they fizzle out, as fads inevitably do, people are still going to long for what is timeless.  Matters that remain true to the human condition throughout generations will never get old.  When it comes to literature, humankind will always long for a well-told love story, as love never goes out of style.  Humankind will always long for accounts about conquering fears or triumphing over enemies; about the sorrow resulting from death and the joy resulting from birth; about degeneracy and righteousness, peril and pain, purpose and hope.  Someone needs to provide humankind with these accounts, attentively and intelligently.

The book industry is in danger of losing the vital core in the essence of literature if writers fail to view themselves as servants.

Yes, a writer creates because creativity is in his blood, and even if he has no audience but himself, he will create anyway, because something internal tells him that he has to.  Yes, a writer naturally learns how to cater to himself, to love what he’s written, but when his work is published for more people to see, his motives cannot remain self-serving.  The writer has now brought his work out before humanity, and if he has any true character, he will consider the needs of the people he is presenting his work to.

Publishers, booksellers, and writers would do well to see themselves as servants of the people they, well, serve—not only figuring out how to get people to buy, buy, buy, but seriously asking themselves, “How can we be of help to society, to humankind?”  Indeed, people often need literature to remind them of the incalculable value of life, so publishers and authors who want to be excellent servants won’t indifferently subject their readers to uninspired filler-content in order to get to a book’s “good parts.”  Otherwise, the art in literature is lost.

Writers needn’t be so busy scrambling to produce what they think will sell that they fail to respect the actual human beings who will be affected by the products.  Audiences are more than screaming fans or faceless wallets; they are hearts, minds, and lives who will, in due course, recognize it when what they are being served is nonsense, something with no significant value to humanity.  I would even encourage us indie authors not to get so caught up trying to put the uppity “powers that be” to shame that we lose the essence of our art, dishonoring our audiences as well as the truth of our own genius because we are not thoughtful about the quality and benefit of what we create.

We don’t want to lose our worth, the worth found in our brilliance and in the significance of what we produce for the world, and in order for us to be truly great writers, we must be servants of all.

Author, editor, and speaker Nadine C. Keels of Seattle, Washington is best known for The Song of Nadine, the lyrical poetry seen in two of her books and heard in her spoken word presentations on both local and national platforms.  Nadine has written two novels, Yella’s Prayers and World of the Innocent, and a reference for writers entitled Write Your Genius, Genius!: A Rather Quick Guide to Book Writing.  Nadine has served as editor and co-editor for a number of titles, and she is the founder of Prismatic Prospects, a communication company based in Seattle. Find Nadine online at www.prismaticprospects.wordpress.com.


  1. Doug Lance says

    More books were published, in a traditional sense, last year than any year preceding it.

    Ebooks are exploding.

    More people are reading every day. Whoever tells you otherwise probably works for a traditional publisher.

    Ebooks represent an easy global distribution model–global. That means that those people around the world who didn’t have access to books or a library before, now just need a computer to access the entire catalog of the world’s best libraries. There are new readers everyday.

  2. says

    Yes! People are indeed still reading, and I’d like to quash the idea (or perhaps even the rumor) that says we aren’t. With the rise and spread of ebooks–fast, cost effective, and easy to access–it’s even more imperative that writers produce quality product. Readers are looking for it.

  3. says

    What the article represents is the rosy glasses most authors look through when they assail to write and sell a book. The fact is that respect has to go both ways in order for the book industry to survive, and when readers would rather read a book for free they are showing disrespect for the author’s hard work at producing it. When readers accept the already low prices set for a book and ebook and recognize that a real person wrote it, then I will be in agreement. But what I see is a hunger for nothing but free information. When all the authors stop writing because they can’t pay their rent, then will the readers understand? I don’t think so.

  4. says

    Good point. I can understand a disenchantment with people who only want free information. As this article is addressed to writers, perhaps there are other ones addressed to readers. (I’ll admit I haven’t looked!) Yet I do believe there are still many people who place a value on information and the ones who provide it. I see it when I encounter the earnest attendees of book readings and signings, or even when I consider determined individuals who work and sacrifice in order to receive an education or to provide the chance for education to someone else. Also, writers are readers too, and they know firsthand what it takes for fellow writers to produce their work.